![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/0e4af9d92b404903b674276377301988.jpg/v1/fill/w_1920,h_1280,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/0e4af9d92b404903b674276377301988.jpg)
![headline.jpg](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/c15836_f7ae0164cd4f4f5ba2d04a979cae7394~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_792,h_396,al_c,lg_1,q_80,enc_avif,quality_auto/c15836_f7ae0164cd4f4f5ba2d04a979cae7394~mv2.jpg)
PLUGING
ULVI KUN APPLICATION
(Application Number: 2016/72052)
That the digital data (Micro SD card) that is the basis of the data analysis report on the applicant, who is serving as the chief of police, contains some records and codes issued by the civil imams of the FETÖ/PDY responsible for the police force, about the police personnel throughout the country, and that it was given to the investigation authorities by a secret witness. It is not possible to accept that it is baseless and arbitrary to accept the information and facts about the applicant contained in this digital data as a strong indication that there is an organizational relationship between FETÖ/PDY and the applicant in the circumstances of the concrete case - therefore the applicant has committed a crime.
For precedent decision click here.
![Image by Nathan Dumlao](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/nsplsh_48969c7688094ae19191d412ab8bd8c2~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_378,h_283,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/Image%20by%20Nathan%20Dumlao.jpg)
![1570436822264-gyjghcghj.jpg](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/c15836_5752b0b552f44913900e3afbcffc6495~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_378,h_213,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/1570436822264-gyjghcghj.jpg)
ABDURRAHMAN NUTRITION APPLICATION
(Application Number: 2017/29347)
As a matter of fact, the Court of Cassation pointed out that the finding that the imams of FETÖ/PDY communicated with people in the private services class via payphone or fixed telephone lines can be accepted as evidence showing the connection of the person with the organization under certain conditions. In these circumstances, the aforementioned fact should be accepted as a strong indication of crime when evaluated together with the above-mentioned witness statement (§48).
For precedent decision click here.